Kurds and the Debate over Stateless Nation Essay

Kurds and the Debate over Stateless Nation - Essay ExampleAmong them, Kurds constitute the prominent conclave as the worlds most numerous people without a homeland. Kurds sovereignty has been the b champion of joust in the Middle vitamin E over several decades between various interest groups including Turks and Arabs and also Britain, France, and US all with their own oil interests over the Northern Iraq, the autonomous region of Kurds. Given below is the magnetic inclination of some relevant sources which could give extensive information on the issue. 1. Gunter, Michael M. KURDS The state and kurds in turkey The hesitancy of assimilation.The Middle East Journal,(2008) 62(2) 344-346. This article is a very good secondary source that nearly reviews the findings of Metin Heper, a distinguished Turkish professor of politics who has recently joined the intellectual debate over the Kurdish issue in bomb calorimeter. According to Gunter (2008), the basic theme of Hepers book is tha t the Turkish body politic has not sought to promote Turkish ethnic nationalism that would assimilate its ethnic Kurdish universe. Heper also points out that the Turkish stance on the issue that is ignoring the distinctiveness of Kurds ethnicity has been deliberate. However, Gunter points some aspects that Heper omitted in his book. For instance, the circumstance that the Kurds came late to the idea of their Kurd-ish identity superseding their Ottoman and Islamic identity cannot be undermined. Gunter refers to Hakan Ozoglu who has documented this idea in his book Kurdish Notables and the ottoman State Evolving Identities. Besides, Gunter identifies several new(prenominal) areas where Heper flawed. As the author points out, Heper simply maintains that Turkey has been convincing itself that it did not try to assimilate the Kurds forcefully but only tried to prevent their de-acculturation. Altogether, Gunter makes a critical evaluation of Hepers findings on the Turkish position on Ku rdish issues. Undoubtedly, the review helps one to reflect on the multiple facets of the debate over Kurds nationalism instead of simply agreeing with the arguments raised by authors like Heper. 2. Olson, Robert. KURDS Kurdish notables and the ottoman state Evolving identities, competing loyalties, and shifting boundaries.The Middle East Journal,(2004) 58(2) 305-307. Olsons review of Ozoglus work KURDS Kurdish Notables and the Ottoman State Evolving Identities is unique for its detailed description on the nature and get-go of the Kurdish nationalism. The writer closely analyses the process of the evolvement of the modern states in terms of socio-political context and the extent to which they arrive at assimilated the fancy of ethno-nationalism and cultural identity. The book actually maintains a very different opinion about the Kurdish movement as compared to the ones proposed by Heper. According to the book, there was no Kurdish protonationalism in the late nineteenth century an d in the early 20th century up to the end of WWII. Olsons review makes the concept of Ozoglu much easier for researchers as he analyses the authors arguments chapter by chapter giving specific focus to the guidance Kurdish nationalism is addressed in them. 3. Romano, David. KURDS-kurdish politics in the middle east.The Middle East Journal,(2010) 64(2) 311-312. This is another brilliant book review by Romano on the great work of Entessar (2010) Kurdish regime in the Middle East. The reviewer has highlighted the authors ability to simplify the complex and unseen aspects of the Kurdish issue. The book has gone very deep into the actual problems of the population including the Kurdish history and politics other than giving