Essay --

Geier v. University of Tennessee 597 F.2d 1056 (6th cir 1979)FactsFaculty element of Tennessee situate University (TSU) Rita Geier (nee Sanders) sought an injunction with the territorial dominion romanceyard to prohibit the proposed amplification of the University of Tennessee at Nashville (UT-N). TSU, a historically black university governed by the State wag of Regents, was the only 4-year degree granting familiar institution in the greater Nashville atomic number 18a while UT-N operated downstairs the independent governance of the University of Tennessee control board and served as ii-year non-degree granting extension college of the UT system. Geier asseverate that the expansion of UT-N to a four-year degree granting institution would maintain two separate, distinct, and segregated systems of higher procreation within the State of Tennessee.The unite States, an interviewing plaintiff-appellee, asserted that the State of Tennessee was in rapine of the Equal Protecti on Clause of the fourteenth amendment with the justification that TSU students received un genuine educational opportunities in comparison to students within the University of Tennessee (UT) system. The United States sought for UT-N and TSU to be interconnected with an additional requirement of a semiformal plan of de segregation to be developed by UT, the Tennessee Higher schooling Commission (THEC), and the State Board of Regents (SBR).Geiers request for an injunction was denied base upon the court not decision records to verify that UT-N was attempting to expand into a degree-granting solar day institution. The district court did even rule that the State of Tennessees dissipate admission policy was not sufficient enough to satisfy the freedoms defend under the 14th amendment and arranged the state defendants (UT Board, THEC, and... ...ill subject to state and federal governance. The federal constitution was a key factor within the district courts decisions as well as the appellate courts decisions and it is imperative that we as policy makers are upholding laws appropriately. Additionally, we can image from the inaction of THEC, the SBR, and the UT board. They had some(prenominal) failed attempts to desegregate the system and the district court ruled multiple generation that they were not making adequate progress. wherefore they did not make a sustained effort to dismantle the multiple system and end segregation can only be hypothesized entirely as policy makers and campus leaders we can learn from their mistakes. The formation of campus form offices and presidential taskforces that get wind campus climate are prime examples of how we are more cognizant affording students with an equitable educational opportunity. Essay -- Geier v. University of Tennessee 597 F.2d 1056 (6th cir 1979)FactsFaculty member of Tennessee State University (TSU) Rita Geier (nee Sanders) sought an injunction with the district court to prohibit the proposed expansion of the University of Tennessee at Nashville (UT-N). TSU, a historically black university governed by the State Board of Regents, was the only 4-year degree granting public institution in the greater Nashville area while UT-N operated under the independent governance of the University of Tennessee Board and served as two-year non-degree granting extension college of the UT system. Geier asserted that the expansion of UT-N to a four-year degree granting institution would maintain two separate, distinct, and segregated systems of higher education within the State of Tennessee.The United States, an interviewing plaintiff-appellee, asserted that the State of Tennessee was in violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th amendment with the justification that TSU students received unequitable educational opportunities in comparison to students within the University of Tennessee (UT) system. The United States sought for UT-N and TSU to be merged with an additional requirement of a formal plan of desegregation to be developed by UT, the Tennessee Higher Education Commission (THEC), and the State Board of Regents (SBR).Geiers request for an injunction was denied based upon the court not finding records to verify that UT-N was attempting to expand into a degree-granting day institution. The district court did however rule that the State of Tennessees open admission policy was not sufficient enough to satisfy the freedoms protected under the 14th amendment and ordered the state defendants (UT Board, THEC, and... ...ill subject to state and federal governance. The federal constitution was a key factor within the district courts decisions as well as the appellate courts decisions and it is imperative that we as policy makers are upholding laws appropriately. Additionally, we can learn from the inaction of THEC, the SBR, and the UT board. They had several failed attempts to desegregate the system and the district court ruled multiple times that th ey were not making adequate progress. Why they did not make a sustained effort to dismantle the dual system and end segregation can only be hypothesized but as policy makers and campus leaders we can learn from their mistakes. The formation of campus diversity offices and presidential taskforces that consider campus climate are prime examples of how we are more cognizant affording students with an equitable educational opportunity.